Featured post

Finding the Debt Reduction Right Lawyer

When you are looking for the best debt reduction lawyer, taking the time to make sure that you are choosing the right person to work with is very important. Before we get into more information regarding debt , we will cover the basics as to what it really takes for your to make sure that you choose the right lawyer if you need to consolidate your loans or if you find yourself in a situation needing legal help with your finances.

Our original Article:

Finding the right lawyer can be a difficult task especially if you do not have any prior experience. In fact, you will have to consider certain conditions prior to finding the right lawyer for your task. On this note, many lawyers often give free consultation to see if they match your need. Even if you are going for a basic legal advice or other serious matter, never take the issue of finding the right lawyer lightly. Is your quest after finding a lawyer that delivers with top-notch professionalism? Are you willing to hire the best lawyer that stands the test of time? Reading through the rest part of this article will help you effectively.

Always determine the type of lawyer that you need. Take your time to know the actual prospect of your need prior to hiring a lawyer. In case your prospect is into business, then look for a professional in that area. You will be able to get the best result as required.

Recommendation is a big factor that should not be underestimated when looking for the right lawyer. Ask from your family, friends, agents or relatives. You will surely get one or two referrals. Contact the listed lawyers and ask of the term of their service. This will help you narrow your list to a successful option.

Finding a lawyer with insurance coverage dictates high professionalism. Always ensure to hire a lawyer that has insurance coverage against any damage. You will be safe in time of trouble. Reputation is also a great factor that you can look at prior to selecting the right lawyer. Always go for a lawyer that is highly reputable in the public.

Finally, budget is also a great factor that can help you select the right lawyer for your need. Always hire or select a lawyer without breaking the bank. You will always have the need to be happy at the end of the whole process.

About.com Resource: http://moneyfor20s.about.com/od/gettingoutofdebt/a/A-Guide-To-Debt-Settlement.htm

hobbyless

At seven p.m., the captain met with his first officer and the flight engineer, they would be flying the classic model in the aviation Industry ?the Boeing 747? If you’re suffering from back pain, seek treatment from an experienced chiropractor in Spokane..The plane was in perfect working condition it departed without incidence. Just before one thirty in the morning, the plane broke out of the clouds and the flight crew glimpsed lights off in the distance.

The Best Meditation Apps For iPhone, iPad And Android

Meditation is a powerful tool.

Singer-songwriter Jewel is a prime example of the practice?s life-changing benefits. In a recent interview with ABC News anchor Dan Harris, she said that learning to meditate helped her manage chronic anxiety and debilitating panic attacks, which stemmed from a tumultuous childhood.

?I learned to do this meditation where I imagined I was on a very stormy ocean,? she told Harris on his ?10% Happier? mindfulness podcast. ?I?d imagine myself sinking through the ocean, allowing myself to relax, I would get calmer. I would notice the color of the ocean change. I?d notice the taste of salt on my lips. I?d notice the rays of sunlight coming in and the further I got down to the sandy floor, it got calm, it got tranquil by then, and I would look up at the stormy surface and it was in the distance.?

The singer is certainly onto something: The benefits of meditation are robust. Research shows it can reduce stress, increase focus and help with the management of pain and sleeping problems.

If you?re looking to add the practice to your life, we?ve rounded up a handful of meditation apps so you can reap the rewards, too. The programs will teach you how to meditate under any condition, give you the tools to handle things that make you anxious (the stress of the political climate, anyone?) and add an overall sense of calm to your day. 

Scroll through the options below and find the one that?s right for you:

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How To Handle Mom-Shamers, According To Kristen Bell

When it comes to being criticized for parenting decisions, Kristen Bell encourages other mothers to not let mom-shamers bring them down.

In an interview with CafeMom, the ?Bad Moms? actress explained she doesn?t let mom-shaming messages affect her. She also encouraged other moms to embrace their way of parenting. 

?If you?re confident with what you?re doing even if that?s some weird, bizarre parenting technique that you know works for your kid or you feel happy about, do it!? she said. ?Don?t let anyone tell you you shouldn?t be doing that.? 

The mom of two had similar advice earlier this year, when she told Babble she won?t let others make her feel embarrassed when her kids have a tantrum in public because they?re simply being kids.

?That shouldn?t make me feel ashamed or embarrassed in any way,? she said. ?Only you can make you feel a certain way.?

While chatting with CafeMom, Bell discussed breastfeeding and why the idea of being uncomfortable with mothers feeding their children is ?comical? to her. When she breastfed her daughters, she was concerned about them, not where she was nursing.

?If you?re aroused by that, I think it?s safe to say that?s your problem and not mine,? she said. ?If it makes you uncomfortable, it?s your responsibility to move away, not mine to cover up.?

The actress also had an important reminder for overwhelmed moms who push their well-being to the wayside to focus on their kids: ?Know when to take a break.?

Read more of Bell?s interview at CafeMom

The HuffPost Parents newsletter, So You Want To Raise A Feminist, offers the latest stories and news in progressive parenting. 

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

What’s For Dinner: Kuku Sabzi Is A Persian Herb Frittata Worth Making

If you?ve got some of your favorite herbs and greens sitting in the fridge, put them to use in this recipe, stat. This Persian herb omelet, known as kuku sabzi, uses less egg than your typical frittata ? the egg acts more like a binder to keep all the important ingredients together, which in this recipe is the greens, obviously.

Kuku is a traditional part of the Norooz, the Persian New Year, because it is a celebration of new spring greens. And that is exactly the kind of recipe we can all use right now, as we transition out of winter into spring. 

Watch the video above to see how it?s done. Or get the written Kuku Sabzi recipe from Bon Appetit.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=More What’s for Dinner… articlesList=58a5d2aae4b037d17d2598bf,5881065ee4b096b4a2305ede,587e45bbe4b0aaa36942a3b1,58c191c9e4b0d1078ca4d46c

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

pantheon

Incase you worked for employers and none is listed as your references, this raises doubts as to how you left previous employments. Always indicate some of your previous employers or colleagues as refereesGoogle % 2B. This shows that you have nothing to hide.

Lawsuit Accusing Trump Of Inciting Rally Violence Gets Green Light From Judge

A Kentucky federal judge has ruled that a startling lawsuit accusing then-candidate Donald Trump of inciting violence at a campaign rally last year can proceed. The suit was brought by three protesters who say they were roughed up by three men provoked by Trump. The Trump supporters were also sued. 

Trump told the audience at the time to ?get ?em out of here,? referring to the protesters ? two women and a teenage boy ? at a rally at the Kentucky International Convention Center in Louisville last March. The confrontation that followed was caught on video that went viral.

Trump?s attorneys argued that the suit should not be allowed to go forward because his speech was protected under the First Amendment ? and that he didn?t intend for violence to occur.

U.S. District Judge David Hale ruled that the protesters? injuries may have been a ?direct and proximate result? of Trump?s actions, and that there is no First Amendment protection for speech that incites violence.

?It is plausible that Trump?s direction to ?get ?em out of here? advocated the use of force,? Hale wrote in his ruling issued Friday. ?It was an order, an instruction, a command. Trump?s statement at least implicitly encouraged the use of violence or lawless action.?

One of the men accused in the attack said in a letter cited by the judge: ?Trump kept saying, ?get them out, get them out,? and people in the crowd began pushing and shoving the protesters. I physically pushed a young woman.?

Plaintiffs Kashiya Nwanguma, Molly Shah and Henry Brousseau are suing Trump and the Trump campaign for incitement to riot, negligence, gross negligence and recklessness, and are seeking unspecified damages.

The judge dismissed part of the suit claiming that Trump and the campaign were ?vicariously liable? for assault and battery. Hale said that the men who apparently attacked the protesters ? who are also being sued ? were not employed by the Trump campaign, nor were they under Trump?s direct control.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage articlesList=56e85c3ce4b0b25c91838893

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Protester Dies In Paraguay Clashes After Congress Re-election Vote

A protester was killed in Paraguay and two top government officials were fired after violent clashes overnight sparked by a secret Senate vote for a constitutional amendment that would allow President Horacio Cartes to run for re-election.

Activists streamed into Paraguay?s capital on Saturday from the landlocked country?s interior in a sign the protests may resume after the country?s Congress was stormed and set on fire.

Firefighters managed to control the flames on the building?s first floor on Friday. Thousands of protesters rioted in other parts of Asuncion and elsewhere in the country into the early hours of Saturday.

Reports of damage and injuries proliferated. At Congress on Saturday, charred debris and glass from broken windows littered the steps.

Rodrigo Quintana, 25, was killed by a rubber bullet fired by police at the headquarters of a liberal youth activist group, the Paraguayan opposition and a prosecutor said.

?We have a commitment to the blood Rodrigo spilled … we will continue the fight,? opposition Senator Miguel Saguier said at a press conference.

The Interior Ministry said in a statement an investigation would be opened into Quintana?s death. Interior Minister Tadeo Rojas was later fired by Cartes along with the national police chief, Crispulo Sotelo.

?We are working to identify the people responsible for the events,? the new interim interior minister, Lorenzo Lezcano, told a news conference.

Around 200 protesters were detained, police said, and shops and government buildings were vandalized.

Several politicians and journalists were injured, local media reported, and the government said several police were hurt. One member of the lower house of Congress, who had been participating in protests that afternoon, underwent surgery after also being hit by rubber bullets.

Meetings for the Inter-American Development Bank?s (IADB) annual board of governors went ahead as scheduled in a rare high-level international event in Paraguay.

IADB President Luis Alberto Moreno called for peace and dialogue and said Paraguay would continue to be a vital partner of the regional bank.

While Paraguay has long suffered from political uncertainty and violence, the soy- and beef-exporting country has attracted investment in agriculture and manufacturing sectors in recent years as Cartes offered tax breaks to foreign investors.

?I think this is a very unfortunate event but I do not see that it will have consequences for the economy,? Finance Minister Santiago Peña said.

Violent upheaval in the country of 6.8 million is a concern for its much larger neighbors Brazil and Argentina, which have increasingly looked to Paraguay for business opportunities. 

CLOSED-DOOR VOTE

The region is already worried about unrest in Venezuela, where President Nicolas Maduro on Saturday moved to quell protests and international condemnation. The pro-government Supreme Court revoked its controversial annulment of the opposition-led congress.

Cartes called for calm and a rejection of violence in a statement released on Twitter on Friday night. He promised the government would do its best to maintain order.

Paraguay?s Senate voted on Friday during a special session in a closed office rather than on the Senate floor. Twenty-five lawmakers voted for the measure, two more than the 23 required for passage in the 45-member upper chamber.

Opponents of the measure, who claim it would weaken Paraguay?s democratic institutions, said the vote was illegal.

The proposal will also require approval by the House, where it appeared to have strong support. A vote which had been expected early on Saturday was called off until the situation calmed down, said the chamber?s president, Hugo Velazquez.

A popular referendum would also be required to change the law prohibiting re-election, passed in 1992 after the brutal dictatorship of Alfredo Stroessner fell in 1989.

(Additional reporting by Luc Cohen and Mariel Cristaldo, writing by Caroline Stauffer and Hugh Bronstein; editing by G Crosse and Mary Milliken)

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Venezuela Rocked by Political Chaos

President Nicolas Maduro asked the Supreme Court in a late-night speech to review a ruling nullifying the lawmaking body after that decision set off a storm of criticism from the opposition and foreign governments.

Golden State Warriors rally past Houston Rockets

OAKLAND, Calif. — The Golden State Warriors held the Houston Rockets scoreless for almost seven minutes of the fourth quarter Friday night, enabling the two-time defending Western Conference champions to overcome a four-point deficit en route to a 107-98 victory.

AT

House Republicans earlier this week passed a bill to scrap regulations preventing internet service providers from sharing customers? personal information, including their web browsing history, without their consent.

Understandably, people aren?t exactly thrilled about the prospect of ISPs profiting off their browsing histories, and are raising hell about it. But AT&T, Comcast and Verizon, having lobbied for exactly that outcome, seem startled by the blowback, as indicated by blog posts the companies published about privacy Friday. 

Put another way: The farmer has decided to spend less time watching the hen house, and the foxes feel they?ve been unfairly maligned, despite having a well-deserved reputation for eating chickens. Oh, and the foxes paid the farmer to look the other way.

Pity the poor foxes.

Comcast struck a conciliatory tone in its blog, with the company?s chief privacy officer Gerard Lewis assuring readers the company does not ?sell … broadband customers? individual web browsing history.?

?We did not do it before the FCC?s rules were adopted,? Lewis writes, ?and we have no plans to do so.? Not having current plans to do so, of course, does not mean they will never do so.

Lewis adds that Comcast has ?committed not to share our customers? sensitive information (such as banking, children?s, and health information), unless we first obtain their affirmative, opt-in consent.?

As with his first reassurance, there?s a caveat here: Mainly, this only applies to select categories of information deemed ?sensitive.? In the next sentence, Lewis elaborates that ?other, non-sensitive data? is indeed used to send targeted ads. To his credit, Lewis provides a link for customers to opt out of receiving those ads, though it?s unclear if opting out of the ads means they cease collecting ?non-sensitive? data.

Lewis closes with a pledge to ?revise [Comcast?s] privacy policy to make more clear and prominent that, contrary to the many inaccurate statements and reports, we do not sell our customers? individual web browsing information to third parties and that we do not share sensitive information unless our customers have affirmatively opted in to allow that to occur.?

In striking contrast to Comcast?s attempts at reassurance, AT&T executive Bob Quinn came out swinging, accusing those critical of Congress? recent regulatory rollback of having a ?fact-free debate.?

Quinn argues that ISPs safeguarded customer data just fine before the FCC introduced these rules, which he casts as the Obama administration putting its ?hand on the scales to pick winners and losers in the marketplace.?

The real problem, Quinn says, is that ?other internet companies, including operating system providers, web browsers, search engines, and social media platforms? are collecting and using customer information in shady ways.

That may well be true, but his argument doesn?t quite pass the smell test. Quinn is effectively saying, ?We totally don?t collect and profit from your personal information? ? while also saying, ?It?s not fair that other companies on the internet get to collect more information than we do.?

Verizon (which owns Huffington Post parent company AOL) also published a similar letter on the topic Friday, defending both its privacy record and using the same tired line about regulatory ?consistency? to defend Congress? rollback this week.

?Let?s set the record straight,? writes chief privacy office Karen Zacharia. ?Verizon does not sell the personal web browsing history of our customers. We don?t do it and that?s the bottom line.

?Consumers benefit and innovations flourish when there is one consistent consumer privacy framework that applies to all internet companies and users in the internet ecosystem.?

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Orange County Sheriff’s Department Admitted To Cultivating ‘Hundreds Of Jailhouse Informants,’ Lawyer Says

LOS ANGELES ? A notorious jailhouse informant program in Orange County has been maintained and promoted for decades by the OC Sheriff?s Department, whose leadership and staff were committed to illegally concealing it ? those are the explosive allegations from Assistant Public Defender Scott Sanders stemming from his review of more than 5,600 internal sheriff?s department documents.

The trove of documents still remains under seal from the public, but Sanders outlined his extensive findings in a blistering motion filed Thursday in the ongoing case against Scott Dekraai, Sanders? client. Dekraai pleaded guilty to killing his ex-wife and seven other people at a Seal Beach hair salon in 2011, in what remains the deadliest mass shooting in county history.

Dekraai still awaits the penalty phase of his case, which has stalled because of egregious misconduct from prosecutors and sheriff?s deputies in their use of jail informants. 

According to Sanders? latest brief, it appears the government deception was far worse than previously understood.

OCSD stopped calling informants ?informants? and started calling them ?sources of information? in order to mislead, according to Sanders.

The new document trove, along with OCSD policy manuals Sanders had previously obtained, reveal that the sheriff?s department changed official vernacular inside the agency in an attempt to ?create cover for false testimony [by their deputies] about the use of informants.? 

Sanders says deputies were ordered to stop calling informants ?informants? and instead call them ?sources of information.? Sanders argues the agency later changed its policy manuals to suggest that ?informants? and ?sources of information? were two different categories of inmates.

Sanders calls the switch ? which allowed deputies to deny a jailhouse informant program existed during the Dekraai hearings ? a ?shameful ?inside joke?? played on Dekraai, his defense team and the court.  

The sheriff?s department currently denies that an informant program exists ? but it admitted to cultivating ?hundreds? of informants a decade ago, Sanders says. 

While the pile of evidence that a jail informant program exists in the county has only grown in the years since Dekraai?s case began, the sheriff?s department has continued to deny it.

?The deputies in the jail are not conducting investigations … we don?t have our folks working informants,? Sheriff Sandra Hutchens has said.

But the cache of documents Sanders reviewed contains numerous internal memos circulated widely among command staff within the OCSD describing the ?need to develop and cultivate informants, the importance of utilizing informants and the details of what informants were sharing,? Sanders notes.

The documents Sanders has examined suggest that the sheriff?s department has ?likely managed well over a thousand informants over the past several decades.?

Sanders cites an email from the document trove that reveals the Special Handling unit, which formerly oversaw inmates and informants inside county jails, claimed that nearly a decade ago it had already ?cultivated hundreds of jailhouse informants.?

Sanders says that according to the contents of the document trove, numerous high-ranking staff members reporting to Sheriff Hutchens are ?fully knowledgeable? about the jailhouse informant program. Those include newly named OCSD public information officer Lt. Lane Lagaret, who previously served as a special handling unit supervisor during the controversial period that produced the once-secret deputy log.

Sanders specifically cites an email that was allegedly once posted on the wall of the special handling unit?s office, sent to Lagaret by deputies under his command, which Sanders says ?emphasized? the role of deputies in their ?cultivating and managing? informants in the jail. The contents of that email is redacted from Sanders? brief as it remains under seal.

The Huffington Post contacted Lagaret about Sanders? allegations against OCSD. Lagaret said he?d heard about the brief, but had not read it. 

?I am not going to make a statement in reference to the brief or any of its contents,? Lagaret said. ?In reference to the email Sanders is referencing, I haven?t read the brief and do not know of any email he references.? 

HuffPost asked for a copy of the email and forwarded the section of the brief describing the email to Lagaret so he could review the allegations, but Lagaret declined to comment further.

?I don?t intend to comment on what he wrote until called upon to do so in court,? Lagaret said.

There are likely still countless key documents missing.

Sanders says the recent trove of documents, along with other internal records he?s obtained, reveals the ?true scope of the jailhouse informant effort? and indicates the presence of far more internal OCSD documentation surrounding their informant effort than has been turned over or even known to exist.

These new documents reference other kinds of logs beyond the special handling log ? module deputy logs, sergeant activity logs, daily briefing logs, administrative segregation logs, none of which have been turned over to the court.

In the Dekraai case, the more than 1,000 pages in the special handling log that OCSD turned over represents just seven of the 65 months Dekraai has spent jailed in the county.

Deputies who have testified in the Dekraai case committed ?flagrant perjury,? the public defender says.

Three OCSD special handling deputies ? Seth Tunstall, William Grover and Ben Garcia ? have all testified about their understanding of an informant program during special evidentiary hearings in the Dekraai case. And the testimony of all three has continued to be undermined by new documents and prior testimony Sanders found from other cases. 

In a 2015 ruling, Superior Court Judge Thomas Goethals called out Tunstall and Garcia for having ?either intentionally lied or willfully withheld information? during their testimony in the Dekraai case. But Sanders says the newly discovered testimony, as well as previously hidden documents, shows that all three deputies committed ?flagrant perjury? in their testimony.

In a 2013 statement Tunstall made in a search warrant for a different case, the deputy wrote that he had ?cultivated, interviewed and supervised numerous confidential informants? and that one of the duties of his unit included ?developing? informants. In 2015, though, he disavowed his earlier admissions, claiming he had used the ?wrong? words. 

But Sanders cites testimony given by Tunstall in two prior cases elicited by Assistant District Attorney Ebrahim Baytieh, in which Tunstall freely admitted his duties included developing informants. Sanders also cites a letter Tunstall wrote in support of the outstanding work of one his best jailhouse informants. 

In Garcia?s original testimony in 2014, he never mentioned an entire jail records system that special handling deputies use to track inmates and informants. In 2015, when questioned about why he didn?t bring up the system, he claimed he couldn?t talk about it in court because that?s how the deputies were trained. 

But Sanders located testimony from Garcia in a separate 2009 homicide case in which he appeared to speak openly about the tracking system, how it was used to document the movements of inmates, and how that information was compiled within a computer database.

During Grover?s 2014 testimony in the Dekraai case, he downplayed his work with informants, saying he spent ?less than zero? time working with informants. ?That?s not my focus,? he said. ?That?s not my scope. I generally am consumed with administrative duties.?

But the once-hidden special handling log contains daily entries by Grover depicting his interaction with informants over nearly five years. Sanders also obtained an internal performance evaluation of Grover in which Grover ?proudly wrote of his efforts with informants.? In that record, Sanders says, his first major accomplishment he wanted to discuss with his supervisor involved a jailhouse informant. Further, a newly discovered slideshow presentation regarding informant use appears to have been created by Grover and directs those who view it to contact him. 

Sanders also cites a key email written by Grover before his testimony in the Dekraai case, stating that OCSD was no longer calling informants ?informants.?

OCDA delayed the release of additional deputy logs in order to ensure a death sentence in a separate murder case, Sander says.

In June, after years of denials, the OCDA?s office finally acknowledged that an informant program does indeed exist and that sheriff?s deputies actively ?recruited and utilized? informants and rewarded them for information. The admission followed the discovery of the 1,000-page special handling log that shed new light on the scope of the informant program inside county jails. 

But Sanders says a series of emails discovered in the new document cache indicate that the OCDA took possession of still more deputies? logs in June 2016 and decided to delay their release to the court until December 2016.

Sanders argues that a deeply troubling but ?likely? explanation for the delay was related to the timing of the sentencing in a separate murder case ? that of Daniel Wozniak, whom Sanders also represents. According to Sanders, the mere existence of these logs would have impeached testimony in hearings held earlier in the Wozniak case. 

By withholding the log until after Wozniak?s case was completed in September 2016, it helped to ?ensure that a death sentence … would be imposed? on Wozniak without the issue emerging or the case being delayed, Sanders says.

When asked about the allegations, OCDA directed The Huffington Post to a December 2016 OCDA press release about the special handling log. The release does not address the allegations of intentional delay.

OC District Attorney Tony Rackauckas has maintained that no one in his office intentionally behaved inappropriately in relation to the jailhouse informant program. OCSD argues similarly and that it has taken steps to create more robust ways of documenting and managing inmates.

The Justice Department announced in December that it was investigating allegations that the informant program used by the sheriff?s and district attorney?s offices had violated defendants? rights. 

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra announced this week that he will continue to seek the death penalty against Dekraai, despite his case being tainted by government misconduct. 

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Secret Service Laptop Holding Trump Tower Floor Plans Stolen From Agent’s Car

A laptop computer containing Trump Tower floor plans and other sensitive intelligence was stolen from a Secret Service agent?s parked vehicle in New York, authorities said.

The theft occurred Thursday morning in Brooklyn, according to CBS News. The Secret Service confirmed the theft.

?Secret Service issued laptops contain multiple layers of security including full disk encryption and are not permitted to contain classified information,? the Secret Service said in a statement.

It?s unclear whether the theft was random, or whether the agent was targeted, according to CBS New York.

NYPD detectives are searching for the laptop. A police source told the New York Daily News that ?it?s a very big deal? and ?they?re scrambling like mad? to catch the thief.

Along with Trump Tower floor plans, the laptop contained sensitive information about the investigation into Hilary Clinton?s campaign emails. Sensitive documents also were taken from the agent?s car, according to CBS2 News, which didn?t elaborate.

The theft adds to a string of recent embarrassments for the Secret Service. Two agents face an internal investigation after allegedly taking a photo of Trump?s sleeping grandchild during a protective detail last week. A week ago, a White House intruder was able to stay on the grounds for 15 minutes before Secret Service agents finally caught him.

The Secret Service ranked dead-last in a 2016 employee survey of 305 federal agencies for employee satisfaction, according to The Washington Post. 

Authorities said they are looking for a white man wearing dark clothing.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Bachelor Episode 7: Nick Cries All The Time

We open in St. Thomas with Nick’s poorly explained existential crisis, in which he doubts that the whole show will work out because he sent Danielle home.  The women worry that he’s going to throw in the towel, and he talks to Chris Harrison about his doubt and ambivalence. Come on, does anyone expect us to believe that Nick is really going to give up this experience for any reason, short of decapitation?  And of course, Nick goes to the women’s hotel and says that, despite being “in his head” which appears to be a Millennial synonym for “experiencing self-doubt,” he will valiantly power through, kind of like a Navy SEAL, and agree to continue traveling the world and hooking up with with adoring beautiful women.  He should get a Purple Heart, or at least a purple condom. The women laugh and sigh with relief that the show will go on, and they have not lost their chance to marry Nick (and deal with the midlife crisis he will undoubtedly have in ten years where he believes he picked the wrong soulmate on this show).

The group adjourns to another island, Bimini, I think, but remember, I can only get through this show if I stick to my no rewinding policy.  The one-on-one date card goes to Vanessa, which makes the Corinne anxious because this is Vanessa’s second date and she hasn’t yet had a one-on-one.   The date is on a yacht, ho hum, and Vanessa expresses her concern about Nick’s ambivalence from the day before. Back at the hotel, Corinne says that Vanessa’s shtick of being a “special needs teacher with a big Italian family” is annoying.  Unlike her “spoiled heiress Daddy’s girl” routine, which is super original.

On the yacht, Vanessa says that Nick is someone that she envisioned but never thought she’d meet, and then they snorkel and make out.  At dinner, she tells the camera that she is planning to tell him that she loves him tonight, and she knows he feels the same way.  She leads in with how they have done many “firsts” together, like snorkeling, and there are many more to come, like possibly threesomes, I guess.  She tells Nick she loves him, and Nick kisses her hand and says he really likes her, and when he next says I love you, he wants it to be like he’s saying it for the first time, because he thinks there is a bigger love out there for him than he has felt for previous women.  Vanessa is hurt, and tells the camera that she thought that his relationship with her was special, and that he would respond that he loved her too.  Except YOU’RE ON THE BACHELOR, fool.

Group date.  Corinne, Raven, and Kristina go sailing with the Nickster, who arrives in some bizarre flowered short shorts.  Corinne and Kristina disrobe down to their bikinis, and Nick starts rubbing suntan lotion into Kristina, which massively irritates Corinne. The activity du jour is swimming with sharks.  I predict that he gets rid of Raven on this date, because she’s not super smart.  Neither is Corinne, obviously, but I don’t know if the producers are going to let him get rid of her, and she also has probably given Nick a secret hand job already.

Dinner date.  We find out a couple of interesting tidbits, like that Raven’s dad had lung cancer, which dissuaded her from continuing law school, so she is potentially less dumb than she appears, in that she could get into law school.  Corinne expresses her anxiety to Nick and he reassures her by making out with her.  Nick cries for some reason to Kristina, and they make out.  He needs to learn to go more than ten minutes without crying, though.  Raven gets the group date rose, which is obvious since she mentioned a sick parent, and that means that she’s going on the hometown date for sure!  Nick and Raven dance and kiss at a concert after she gets the rose, and the other two discarded women pout alone.

One-on-one with Danielle the boring neonatalia nurse.  That was a typo for neonatal because I’m so used to to typing Natalia, the name of my oldest child, but it looks like a complex Latin word for a disease so I’m leaving it.  They play basketball with some random kids, who I hope got paid for their participation on this show.  Then they sit and gaze out at the water, but they don’t seem to have very deep conversation, and, as I continue to point out, she is as boring as lint, so I hope he gets rid of her.   At dinner, they talk about getting to know each other and he brings up hometown dates and her dead fiancee.  She says that she hasn’t introduced any guy to her family since the dead one, and continues, “I want you to know that my heart is very open.  And it’s very open to you.”  WTF.  Then she says that she is scared because she doesn’t know how he feels, and looking at his face, I know how he feels.  He tells her that he has experienced “longing” and “burning desire” in the past with others, and he wants it with her, but his heart can’t get there.  Whoa, that wasn’t necessary. But it’s true, her reserve and boringness doesn’t lend itself to passionate obsession.

Danielle cries and leaves.  She says that she wishes he would return and say he made a big mistake, but no such luck.  The other girls hug her goodbye, and Raven says how shocked she is.  Corinne says that Nick is unpredictable and she needs to make sure that she gets a hometown date, so she’s going to sneak over and see him.  She puts on her full seductress regalia, including Louboutin heels and black skinny pants.  She knocks on his hotel room door.  He offers her a nightcap, while her voiceover says that she “knows how to turn on the sex charm.” As soon as the conversation falters, which is fairly soon since she’s an idiot, she starts to kiss him to make up for it.  She tells the interviewer that her heart is gold but her “vaginne is platinum.”  She adjourns with Nick to the bedroom, where we hear her tell Nick to massage her boobs, I think, but then he stops the party and says that he doesn’t think this is a good idea.  This throws Corinne into a frenzy of self-doubt and insecurity, which doesn’t look cute.

Rachel’s one-on-one.  They go a bar known for no tourists, which is not too believable, since they’re there.  Nick asks if he’s the first white guy that Rachel will have brought home, and she says yes, and he resolves to call her dad, “Sir” and not his first name.  Then they make out.  It seems that Rachel continues to be a front runner, and when she returns to the hotel, Corinne almost has a panic attack about her own uncertain status.

Nick tells Chris Harrison that he knows who he wants to eliminate, but he wants to do it before the rose ceremony out of respect for this person.  Then Nick walks to the women’s hotel and asks to speak to…. Kristina, of all people.  That was a curveball! While he speaks to Kristina, Corinne freaks out wondering if Kristina is getting eliminated or not.  Outside on the veranda, Nick cries yet again, and tells Kristina that he feels love for her but he is not in love with her.  She says, “You didn’t give me a fair chance.”  He says, “There are stronger relationships right now in the house.”  They both cry.  Then he walks away, and the women comfort her back in the house.  Poor Kristina says that she never pictured her life with anyone else before Nick, and cries as the limo drives away.

Next week: “hometown dates are on the line and you won’t believe what Nick decides,” another woman returns to confront Nick, and Nick trods solemnly through the snow in a suit, which indicates that they have left St. Thomas for somewhere less enviable.  Till we meet again, I remain, The Blogapist Who Says, Kristina Will Be Shoveling Dudes Away From Her Door After She Gets Home.

This post was originally published here on Dr. Psych Mom. Follow Dr. Rodman on Dr. Psych Mom, Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and Pinterest.

Order 52 Emails to Transform Your Marriage and How to Talk to Your Kids about Your Divorce: Healthy, Effective Communication Techniques for Your Changing Family.

Learn about Dr. Rodman’s private practice, including therapy, coaching, and consultation, here. This blog is not intended as diagnosis, assessment, or treatment, and should not replace consultation with your medical provider.

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/samantha-rodman-phd/the-bachelor-episode-7-ni_b_14751068.html

Gulping Gargoyles, J.K. Rowling Looked Incredible At The BAFTAs

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2017/02/13/jk-rowling-baftas_n_14720154.html

J.K. Rowling took a break from owning trolls on Twitter to owning the BAFTAs red carpet on Sunday. 

The author looked straight-up magical in a long-sleeved, fitted maroon gown with a thigh-high slit. 

She paired the gown with purple pumps, a sparkly clutch and some serious statement earrings. 

“Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them” took home an award for best production design, but we’d say Rowling herself won the award for best selfie of the night, posing with “Beasts” star Eddie Redmayne and Emma Stone.

Swoon. So much to obsess over, so little time. Check out the rest of the looks from the show: 

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

U.S. Warns North Korea Of ‘Overwhelming’ Response If They Use Nukes

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2017/02/03/us-warns-north-korea-nukes_n_14593248.html

U.S. President Donald Trump’s defense secretary warned North Korea on Friday of an “effective and overwhelming” response if it chose to use nuclear weapons, as he reassured South Korea of steadfast U.S. support.

“Any attack on the United States, or our allies, will be defeated, and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming,” Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said at South Korea’s defense ministry, at the end of a two-day visit.

Mattis’ remarks come amid concern that North Korea could be readying to test a new ballistic missile, in what could be an early challenge for Trump’s administration.

North Korea, which regularly threatens to destroy South Korea and its main ally, the United States, conducted more than 20 missile tests last year, as well as two nuclear tests, in defiance of U.N. resolutions and sanctions.

The North also appears to have also restarted operation of a reactor at its main Yongbyon nuclear facility that produces plutonium that can be used for its nuclear weapons program, according to the U.S. think-tank 38 North.

“North Korea continues to launch missiles, develop its nuclear weapons program and engage in threatening rhetoric and behavior,” Mattis said.

North Korea’s actions have prompted the United States and South Korea to respond by bolstering defenses, including the expected deployment of a U.S. missile defense system, known as Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), in South Korea later this year.

The two sides reconfirmed that commitment on Friday.

China, however, has objected to THAAD, saying it is a direct threat to China’s own security and will do nothing to bring North Korea back to the negotiating table, leading to calls from some South Korean opposition leaders to delay or cancel it.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang reiterated China’s opposition, which he said would never change.

“We do not believe this move will be conducive to resolving the Korean peninsula nuclear issue or to maintaining peace and stability on the peninsula,” Lu told a daily news briefing in Beijing.

South Korean Defense Minister Han Min-koo said Mattis’ visit to Seoul – his first trip abroad as defense secretary – sent a clear message of strong U.S. support.

“Faced with a current severe security situation, Secretary Mattis’ visit to Korea … also communicates the strongest warning to North Korea,” Han said.

Once fully developed, a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) could threaten the continental United States, which is about 9,000 km (5,500 miles) from North Korea. ICBMs have a minimum range of about 5,500 km (3,400 miles), but some are designed to travel 10,000 km (6,200 miles) or more.

Former U.S. officials and other experts have said the United States essentially has two options when it comes to trying to curb North Korea’s fast-expanding nuclear and missile programs – negotiate or take military action.

Neither path offers certain success and the military option is fraught with huge dangers, especially for Japan and South Korea, U.S. allies in close proximity to North Korea.

Mattis is due in Japan later on Friday.

– This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.